Activism Government Internet Freedom

New Ruling Shows the NSA Can’t Legally Justify This Type of Spying Anymore

Stay ahead of the curve... Get top posts first!

Thank you for subscribing!

Get updates on Facebook

Court of Appeals says NSA tracking your movements using this kind of data from without a warrant is unconstitutional.

The United States v. Davis case is important because it provides substantive and procedural protections against abuse of an increasingly common, highly invasive government surveillance method – cell phone tracking.

* The Davis decision suggests that the U.S. government’s collection of all kinds of business records and transactional data — commonly called “metadata” — for law enforcement and national security purposes may also be unconstitutional.

* The Court of Appeals concluded that under the “reasonable expectation of privacy” test, location information is Fourth Amendment protected.

This is great privacy news for anyone who uses a cell phone. This suggests that when appellate courts finally get hold of the NSA’s bulk metadata collection programs, these programs may very well be knocked down.

[

Want our best on Facebook?

Facebook comments

“New Ruling Shows the NSA Can’t Legally Justify This Type of Spying Anymore”